Federal Court Blocks Key Provisions of Trump’s Election Integrity Executive Order

A significant legal decision unfolded on Thursday when Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., put a halt to major elements of President Donald Trump’s executive order concerning election integrity. The judge’s ruling specifically addressed requirements for documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration.

Background of the Ruling

This legal action stemmed from lawsuits initiated by three distinct groups against five different provisions established in Trump’s executive order dated March 25. While Kollar-Kotelly dismissed efforts to obstruct three of these provisions, she agreed to pause two related to proof of citizenship prior to voter registration.

Details of the Blocked Provisions

The first of the enjoined provisions aimed to mandate the Election Assistance Commission to revise national voter registration forms to require documentary proof of citizenship. The second blocked provision intended to compel federal agencies that provide voter registration assistance in conjunction with public aid to evaluate applicants’ citizenship status prior to registration.

Judicial Commentary

In her ruling, Kollar-Kotelly emphasized the constitutional roles of Congress and the States over the federal government in regulating electoral processes. She remarked, “Our Constitution entrusts Congress and the States – not the President – with the authority to regulate federal elections,” further stating that the legislative process cannot be circumvented by executive order.

Responses and Legislative Context

Following this ruling, the House of Representatives, led by Republicans, passed a bill mandating proof of citizenship for participation in federal elections. This legislation still awaits consideration in the Senate before it can be enacted by the President.

Current Legislative Landscape

According to the Voting Rights Lab, there is ongoing movement in legislative circles, with 25 states evaluating some form of proof-of-citizenship laws. Notably, 15 state constitutions contain explicit bans on voting by non-citizens.

Impact Beyond Election Integrity

Additionally, Judge Kollar-Kotelly’s ruling aligns with similar judicial sentiments expressed in recent weeks, as federal judges in Maryland and New Hampshire also set aside separate orders from Trump aimed at dissolving diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in K-12 public education. This followed challenges from organizations such as the National Education Association and the ACLU, who claimed that conditional federal funding encroached on First Amendment rights.

Conclusion

The White House has yet to issue a response regarding the implications of Kollar-Kotelly’s ruling, as inquiries from Fox News Digital remain unanswered ahead of this publication.