Home » The Judicial Appointment Journey Begins

The Judicial Appointment Journey Begins

by
The judicial appointment journey begins

Whitney Hermandorfer Nominated to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

President Donald Trump has put forth Whitney Hermandorfer as a nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. This marks Trump’s first judicial appointment of his second term, succeeding Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch, who was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2010.

Judicial Appointment Framework

The U.S. Constitution empowers Congress under Article I to establish “Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court,” which include specialized courts like the U.S. Tax Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. These judges serve fixed terms, in stark contrast to Article III judges, who are nominated for life, contingent on “good Behaviour.” Article III includes key courts such as the U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals, which collectively exercise the “judicial Power of the United States.”

Context of Judicial Confirmations

The current landscape of judicial appointments differs significantly from Trump’s initial term. During President Obama’s last two years, a Republican-controlled Senate confirmed only 22 judges—representing a mere 2.6% of the total judiciary, the lowest percentage since the Constitution’s ratification in 1789. Consequently, 106 vacancies were present when Trump took office in March 2017.

In contrast, under President Joe Biden, Democrats confirmed 139 judges over the past two years, comprising the third-highest total in U.S. history. As a result, only 5.3% of the judiciary currently remains unfilled, marking the lowest vacancy rate for a new presidency in more than four decades.

The Path Ahead for Trump’s Appointments

Historically, an average of 45 judicial seats become vacant each year, with three-fourths of these from judges taking “senior status.” If this trend continues, Trump could potentially appoint over 400 judges across both of his terms, surpassing all previous presidential records.

Profile of Whitney Hermandorfer

Whitney Hermandorfer’s nomination reflects a continued commitment to the priorities established during Trump’s first term. She earned her law degree from George Washington University Law School, where she served as editor-in-chief of the law review. Hermandorfer has clerked for notable jurists, including Richard Leon, Brett Kavanaugh, and Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett. Currently, she is the director of the Strategic Litigation Unit in the Office of the Tennessee Attorney General, earning recognition as a “rising star” in appellate law from the Legal 500.

Reactions to the Nomination

Immediately following her nomination, liberal advocacy groups expressed strong opposition, labeling it “appalling” and indicative of a “dangerous direction for the judiciary.” Critics argue that Trump aims to “stack the judiciary” with judges aligned with his political objectives. This reaction mirrors demands from the same groups, who urged President Biden to appoint judges that would advance his agenda and considered proposals for “packing” the Supreme Court.

As the nomination progresses, scrutiny and debate are expected to intensify, focusing on the implications of Hermandorfer’s prospective judicial philosophy and its alignment with Trump’s administration.

Source link

You may also like

About Us

At Republican Digest, we aim to provide accurate and insightful coverage of issues that matter most to Republicans and conservative-minded individuals. From breaking news on Capitol Hill to in-depth analysis of policies, campaigns, and elections, we strive to keep our readers informed about the latest developments within the GOP and beyond.

Copyright ©️ 2024 Republican Digest | All rights reserved.