Leadership Changes at the ATF: A Shift in Gun Control Policy?
The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) has recently witnessed the retirement or departure of a prominent official, Senior Policy Counsel Eric Epstein, amidst ongoing scrutiny over the agency’s gun regulation policies.
Context of Recent Departures
Epstein is not the first official to leave under contentious circumstances. His departure follows the notable exit of Pam Hicks, previously the Bureau’s Chief Legal Counsel, who was also regarded as a strong advocate for stringent gun control measures. Hicks was dismissed following an executive order by President Trump focused on protecting Second Amendment rights—a decision that sparked praise from supporters of gun rights while drawing ire from gun control advocates.
Additionally, Marvin Richardson, former ATF Deputy Director, was compelled to retire. Richardson supported regulations such as the controversial pistol brace rule and had discussions with the Biden transition team shortly after the 2020 election. His leadership contributed to the enactment of several stringent gun control measures, leading to further celebrations among pro-gun circles upon his departure.
Epstein’s Controversial Contributions
Eric Epstein’s influence on ATF regulations has been particularly contentious within the pro-gun community. Notably, he was responsible for crafting the “engaged in the business” (EIB) rule, which would classify individuals selling even a single firearm as engaging in commercial activities, thereby necessitating a federal firearms license (FFL). This proposed rule emerged after Congress rejected universal background checks and is currently subject to an injunction that may lead to its withdrawal.
Pistol Brace Regulations
Epstein also played a significant role in developing the reclassification policy for pistol braces, transforming many equipped pistols into short-barreled rifles (SBRs) under the National Firearms Act (NFA). This change subjects gun owners to extensive registration requirements, punishable by up to 10 years in prison and substantial fines if not complied with. This rule has been met with legal challenges, further complicating its enforcement.
Influence on Ghost Gun Regulations
Another aspect of Epstein’s role involved the frames and receivers rule, which expanded the definition of a firearm to include incomplete components, thus aiming to hinder the production of privately manufactured firearms—often referred to as “ghost guns.” While a recent Supreme Court ruling has upheld aspects of this regulation, it has already prompted some manufacturers, like Polymer80, to cease operations.
Legal Advocacy
Epstein’s involvement extended into legal disputes as he provided testimony in a case challenging the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) position on concealed carry permits not serving as alternatives to the Brady background checks. This affidavit was presented in response to a lawsuit initiated by Gun Owners of America (GOA), showcasing his steadfast position on the DOJ’s interpretations.
Legacy and Future Implications
Epstein’s legacy as a proponent of stringent gun control measures raises the question of who may be the next target of scrutiny within the ATF. As the agency undergoes significant personnel changes, the future direction of gun policy enforcement could hinge on the appointments that follow.
About the Author:
John Crump is a seasoned NRA instructor and constitutional activist with a passion for firearms advocacy. He has extensively reported on gun rights and the implications of legislative changes in this area. John resides in Northern Virginia with his family. Follow him on social media at @crumpyss or visit his website at www.crumpy.com.
